Welcome to ddans.com;

a continually developing, interactive website, helping to serve Current and Future; Clients, Entertainers and Fans.

"D" Dan's Entertainment Agency,

Established in 1986

Florida Talent Agency Lic. # TA763.

Go Back to Artist Page

 

About Music Regulation

To judge someone’s taste in music or lyrics would be similar to judging the way another breaths or speaks.  One man, with a beautiful voice, may choose to take a vow of silence for life, while another may choose to cuss like a sailor.  Each scenario may be deemed tragic...but what natural right is bestowed to any man to censure the choice of either, or to switch the choices of each, or further, to censor them and those who choose to listen, or not.

No words written or sung by any musician or vocalist could ever be as VILE as any words concocted by politicians and writ into law to take ones freedom of speech away, thereby hindering ones natural rights.

It could pain me to see someone that was unable to speak due to an ailment, or worse, by choice (with respect to their cause).  It would be irritating, for me, to hear someone cursing all the time.  But, in either case, I can look down and see that I do have feet.  I am able to walk away and leave either man with "their choice”, which they made for “their lives”.  I too can leave those who "choose" to be in their company. Et al., I leave them with the personal ramifications of their choices as well.

Regarding particular song lyrics and songs - first, start by telling me the lyrics and instrumentation you hear as you create original music in your mind or on paper?  If you don't, then leave it to those that do. The market place will determine the value of the breath and scope of each man’s/woman’s work.  If their work is unworthy of usage by others they can always serve as an example of what falls short, or fails altogether.  My dear Grandfather used to say: "man always has a purpose; he can always serve as a bad example".  But who is the bad example when it comes to regulation of speech or verse; I would say any Law makers or the Judge that seeks to infringe upon any man or woman's inalienable rights.  It wasn't the legislators or jurist who gave us tongues, it wasn't they who gave us hands with which to write.  Depending on your view, it was either He that made the Universe or the Universe itself that gave us these gifts and no man or body of men have an inkling of a right to take their use away from any of us. 

This hold true in all cases of Free Speech.  Removing the right of free speech is a tell-tale sign of a Government gone bad - where the majority body is Corrupt.  It is a protective mechanism for the purposes of keeping their corruption secret for as long as possible and/or to keep them in power for as long as possible.  A righteous political body has no need to curtail critical scrutiny or free speech, it should welcome dialogue, not fear it.

Regulation of songwriters would be an attempt to regulate word-combinations and adrenal outflows, as people express them, and the pleasure they feel in releasing the endorphins felt in the songs original creation...creation too is an inevitable extension of Nature and God.  Witness a bee that makes a Honey comb, a Beaver making a dam or an ant making the mound. Yet, Politicians and Judges should not taint another's creative expression to fulfill their own thirst for endorphins, serotonin, and Power.  One act of creation within its creative expression seems more righteous, while the other is definitely oppressive.

Undoubtedly the same thrill in creation is felt by legislators passing legislation or by judges writing a ruling...benignly, if it benefits their constituents, it is work rewarded.  However, when either seeks to take away freedoms granted by, first; Nature, and second; our Constitution it becomes the farthest thing from benign, it is a crime against humanity and humanities children.  To censor those who granted them the right to be in such a position to write such legislation would be outright indignations against Nature, God and the people they serve. 

In each act of creation there is a search for benefits, power or empowerment.  Yet, one, more so, is to empower an individual and the people who find his or her message worthy. The other, is to empower the same, yet,  it squelches "an entire people", their offspring, and their collective inalienable rights manifestly denying use of what Nature and Gods Law intended to allow...That is; to use the vocal cord granted to them, by no man.

Regulation does not belong in this natural realm because the feelings felt in creation, these beneficial liquors, are dispensed by God or Nature itself. 

Music has been bestowed upon man since his/her first "moving" musical encounter.  It may have been something as simple as a rock that tumbled down a gravely hillside and created a simple beat which was enhanced by echoes bouncing off nearby granite slopes.  Where a slightly bored human was so moved by the sounds heard, he/she gather up two stones in hands and made a conscious decision to tap them together, in an attempt to recreate that certain something  heard.  Importantly, it was  found to be pleasant, he/she may have hummed or laughed as the noises reached human ears. Was music made? Those present made that determination - unhindered by government.

Past escapades and experiments of man leads us to these times, these sounds.  Several hundred years from now few sounds from this time may survive the scrutiny of time and tastes.  Will anything created today tell the tale of this time, and what tale will it tell?  Will it have forecasted the downfall of certain civilizations...or, will it be as interesting as someone knocking two stones together?  Or will a song have such power to change someone's thinking to lead them and others to a better future.  Mans freedom to experiment will determine what is found pleasant and important from here on out. 

With that said,  I'll leave you with a couple of thoughts:

Have no doubt, Tribes do exist and will continue to exist among us -often music is, and will be, the catalyst to their bond.

and

 A kiss leads to more, and so shall music be rearranged, as the present becomes mundane.

Dayn Lacke,  January 4, 2007

  Back to top

Copyright Dayn Lacke 2007-2009

 

Send mail to Webmaster@ddans.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright 1986-2009 "D" Dan's Entertainment Agency, All Rights Reserved.

 Last modified: April 22, 2009